Sutton Bridge in David and Goliath battle

Sutton Bridge residents don't want another power plant on the riverbank.
Sutton Bridge residents don't want another power plant on the riverbank.
2
Have your say

Villagers who fought off a gasifier power station would be ‘bankrupted’ by a hefty legal bill to derail a second power plant beside the Nene.

Sutton Bridge Parish Council is preparing for a “David and Goliath” fight to overturn Government consent for EDF B, a multi-million, 1800MW combined-cycle power station.

Parish council chairman John Grimwood: "It's another David and Goliath situation."

Parish council chairman John Grimwood: "It's another David and Goliath situation."

But the battle won’t go to judicial review in the High Court because the parish council can’t afford to stump up £60,000 in legal fees – or far more if it were to lose the case.

Parish council chairman John Grimwood said: “It would bankrupt the village. The parish hasn’t got that money.

“Hand on heart I can’t put people’s money on one side and say ‘I am going to put you in debt’.”

Former parish councillor Shirley Giles used her own cash to overturn South Holland District Council’s planning consent for the gasifier by going to judicial review.

That cost around £3,500, which the great-granny won back, but now the bill for a second legal action has soared out of everyone’s reach.

Coun Grimwood said: “Again it’s a David and Goliath situation.
“Basically it’s like big business trying to trample on a very small village.”

He said the legal bill is higher because a group of people would be involved in any potential legal case, rather than one person, the issues are far different and the parish council’s working party switched to new lawyers because the ones who beat the gasifier are no longer involved in this kind of work.

The parish council held an extraordinary meeting on Tuesday night – attended by 30-40 members of the public – when the costs of a legal action were outlined.

Coun Grimwood said £60,000 was “ballpark” and the parish council could potentially have costs to pay if it lost the case.

Although the Government has given consent for EDF B, the energy company has yet to make an investment decision to build the plant and Coun Grimwood said the parish council’s cash would be wasted if EDF doesn’t go ahead.

If built, EDF B would have three stacks – while the existing gas-fired power station has two – and villagers are worried about potential combined emissions from both plants and those from other industries.

Coun Grimwood said there’s an “orange plume” from the power station, like the one in Spalding, and residents are worried by that.

He also can’t understand why a new plant is even being considered when a similar one in King’s Lynn was decommissioned a few years ago.

Working party member Colin Blundell said the fight will now focus on the Ombudsman, to look at the planning consent, and a separate challenge on Government reasons for giving consent with a view to forcing a rethink.

Mrs Giles said “it’s a shame” the cost of legal action is so high and she agrees with Coun Grimwood that the money can’t come from the parish council.

She said: “It is a rather astronomical price. There just isn’t the money there.”

MP John Hayes has already voiced concerns with his own Government about the power plant going on a riverbank that was almost overtopped by the tidal surge of December 2013, while villagers are worried about a greenfield site being used and any potential risk of harm to The Wash, an internationally protected RAMSAR marine habitat.

• South Holland and Lincolnshire County councils could have forced a public inquiry if either authority had objected.

Previously ...

Government consent for power station

New power station battle in ‘the Bridge’

Has great-gran (75) beaten the gasifier?

Victory is sweet for gasifier campaigners